- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 12 December 2023
- Case no.
- CRLR 1918/2022
Judgment
Court No. - 82 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1918 of 2022 Revisionist :- Smt. Mamta Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Through Secretary Home And 5 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Shaili Ganguly,Archana Jha,Pragati Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Krishna Kant Yadav Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J. Heard Ms. Shaili Ganguly, learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. None appears for opposite party no.2. The present criminal revision has been filed against the order dated
12.04.2022, passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rampur in Misc. Criminal Case No.109 of 2022 (Smt. Mamta v. Surendra Singh and others), under section 156 (3) Cr.P.C., P.S. Bilaspur, District Rampur. Learned counsel for the revisionist states that his application under Section 156 (3) has been rejected without application of mind. Being aggrieved with the aforesaid order, the present criminal revision has been preferred by learned counsel for revisionist. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances the learned counsel for the revisionist accepts that there is an alternative efficacious remedy of lodging complaint under section 190 Cr.P.C. In view of above, the criminal revision is disposed of with a direction that in case the revisionist moves an application u/s 190 Cr.P.C., the same may be considered in accordance with law. Order Date :- 13.12.2023 A.N. Mishra High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.