Imtiyaz Khan Alias Pappu and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 89 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37408 of 2023 Applicant :- Imtiyaz Khan Alias Pappu And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Naushad Siddiqui,Manish Tandon,Satya Dheer Singh Jadaun Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mohd. Ashraf Abbasi,Tazim Ansari Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶2The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the cognizance/summoning order dated 14.11.2022, charge sheet dated

10.05.2022, as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 22906 of 2022, arising out of Case Crime No. 101 of 2022 (State vs. Imtiyaz Khan alias Pappu and Others), against applicant no. 1/Imtiyaz, under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC Police Station-Saiyadraja, District-Chandauli and against applicant nos. 2 to 4, under Sections 504, 506 IPC, Police Station-Saiyadraja, District-Chandauli, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandauli.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that charged section is non-cognizable section and the learned Magistrate may pass an order taking cognizance, if he so desires, by proceeding under Chapter XV of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Reliance has been placed to Explanation 2(d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which reads as follows:- "Explanation-- A report made by a police officer in a case which discloses, after investigation, the commission of a non-cognizable offence shall be deemed to be a complaint, and the police officer by whom such report is made shall be deemed to be the complainant."

¶4Learned A.G.A. has stated that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the instant application pending.

¶5Therefore, on the basis of aforesaid Explanation, which has been interpreted by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Application u/s 482 No. 45609 of 2018 (Santosh Kumar and 2 others vs. State of U.P. and others) decided on 31.1.2019, wherein it has been held that when the charge-sheet is only of non-cognizable offence, in view of the aforesaid provision, the charge sheet should be treated as a complaint.

¶6The argument of learned counsel for the applicant is well founded and the order taking cognizance is set aside. Now, the Magistrate may pass an order taking cognizance, if he so chooses, by proceeding in this matter as a complaint case under Chapter XV of the Code of Criminal Procedure. He can also keep in mind Proviso(a) to Section 200 Cr.P.C., which reads as follows:- "Provided that, when the complaint is made in writing, the Magistrate need not examine the complainant and the witnesses."

(a) If a public servant acting or purporting to act in discharge of his official duties or a Court has made the complaint;"

¶7With these observations, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 14.12.2023 Aditya High Court of Judicature at Allahabad