- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 13 December 2023
- Case no.
- CRLR 5573/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 82 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5573 of 2023 Revisionist :- Raja Ram Baudh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Navin Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,A.K. Mishra,Sati Shanker Tripathi Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J. Heard Sri Navin Kumar, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Sati Shanker Tripathi, learned counsel for the opposite parties and learned A.G.A. for the State. Learned counsel for the revisionist has challenged the order dated
05.10.2023 for producing the handwriting expert to examine the signatures on the disputed cheques. The learned Trial Court while considering the aforesaid submission has recorded its reasons that the accused in his statement under Sections 251 Cr.P.C. and 313 Cr.P.C. had himself admitted that he signed the cheques. The application has been moved to delay the trial proceedings. Therefore, the application of the revisionist was dismissed awarding special cost of Rs. 200/- which was to be deposited at the District Legal Services Authority. From the perusal of the record, we find that the learned Trial Court has passed the impugned order, after application of mind and after considering the facts and circumstances in totality. There is no illegality in the impugned order. The revision is, accordingly, dismissed. Order Date :- 14.12.2023 Shivani High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.