- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 13 December 2023
- Case no.
- A482 44564/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 86 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 44564 of 2023 Applicant :- Narendra Kumar @ Nandu And 5 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Amar Jeet Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Deepak Kumar Kol Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Deepak Kumar Kol, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
¶2This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to quash the entire proceedings of Case No. 8103 of 2022 (State Vs. Narendra Kumar @ Nandu and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 352 of 2020, under Sections 147, 149, 452, 323, 506 IPC, P.S.-Sadar Bazar, District-Meerut, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut.
¶3Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that applicants and opposite party No. 2 are next door neighbours and on account of trivial dispute, the instant criminal case was instituted against the applicants, however with the intervention of the respected members of both the family and society, the parties have amicably and genuinely settled all their disputes and differences and now they do not have any grievance against each other.
¶4Learned counsel for the applicants has next drawn the attention of the Court to a settlement-agreement dated 24.7.2023 drawn between the parties, a copy of which has been annexed as Annexue No. 3 to this application.
¶5Leaned counsel for the applicants has further submitted that pursuant to the said compromise, the applicants had approached this Court by filing an Application u/s 482 No. 28119 of 2023 and this Court had directed the parties to appear before the court below and get the said compromise verified vide order 3.8.2023. Pursuant to the said order, parties appeared before the court below and in presence of both the parties, the said compromise has been verified and and verification report/order dated 22.9.2023 has been passed, a copy of which has been annexed as Annexure No. 3 to this application.
¶6Learned counsel for the applicants has next submitted that in view of the said compromise, which has already been verified and in order to maintain harmonious and cordial relations between them, entire proceedings be quashed against the applicants.
¶7Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has also appeared and has acknowledged the said compromise and has stated, on instruction, that opposite party No. 2 has no objection if the entire proceedings are quashed.
¶8Learned AGA could not dispute the aforesaid facts.
¶9This Court is not unmindful of the judgements of the Apex Court in the cases of :-
¶1B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another
(2003) 4 SCC 675.
¶2Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation [2008) 9 SCC 677].
¶3Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others ( 2008) 16 SCC 1.
¶4Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303.
¶5Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab ( 2014) 6 SCC 466. Wherein the Apex Court has categorically held that compromise can be made between the parties even in respect of certain cognizable and non compoundable offences. Reference may also be made to the decision given by this Court in Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. and another [2013 (83) ACC 278], in which the law expounded by the Apex court in the aforesaid cases has been explained in detail.
¶10Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as noted herein above, and also the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, the court is of the considered opinion that no useful purpose shall be served by prolonging the proceedings of the above mentioned case.
¶11Accordingly, the entire proceedings of Case No. 8103 of 2022 (State Vs. Narendra Kumar @ Nandu and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 352 of 2020, under Sections 147, 149, 452, 323, 506 IPC, P.S.-Sadar Bazar, District-Meerut, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut, are hereby quashed.
¶12This application under Section 482 CrPC is accordingly allowed. Order Date :- 14.12.2023 KU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.