- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 14 December 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 42470/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42470 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ram Niranjan Respondent :- Union Of India And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vikrant Pandey,Ram Awadh Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.,Sudhir Bharti,Vaibhav Tripathi Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,Acting Chief Justice Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
¶1Heard Sri Vikrant Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rajeev Gupta, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the state-respondents, Sri Vaibhav Tripathi, counsel for the National Highways Authority of India and Sri Sudhir Bharti, counsel for respondent no.5.
¶2The instant petition is directed against the award of the Arbitrator dated
25.04.2023 in exercise of power under Section 3G (5) of the National Highways Act, 1956.
¶3Sri Vaibhav Tripathi, learned counsel for NHAI submits that the petitioner has efficacious alternative remedy of filing an objection under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 3G (6) of the National Highways Act, 1956.
¶4We find considerable force in the submission of the learned counsel for the respondents.
¶5As the petitioner has an alternative remedy available to him under the statute, therefore, we relegate him to the said remedy as we are not inclined to examine the factual disputes relating to quantification of the compensation amount in exercise of writ jurisdiction.
¶6The petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy provided under the statute. Order Date :- 15.12.2023 Mukesh Kr. (Kshitij Shailendra,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,A.C.J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.