Raghuraj v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Court No. - 48 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 4114 of 2023 Petitioner :- Raghuraj Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravindra Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.

¶1Petitioner is aggrieved that chak allotted to him during consolidation proceedings is not connected with any chak road.

¶2Sri Ravindra Prakash Srivastava, learned counsel for petitioner, has not disputed that chak allotted to petitioner was purchased by a sale deed and it is as per the boundaries mentioned therein. Revisional Authority has also held that all parties were allotted chaks according to their sale deeds and boundaries mentioned therein. Therefore, there is no illegality in the impugned order.

¶3At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner, submits that the writ petition be disposed of with liberty to petitioner to approach before concerned authority for chak marg.

¶4The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty, as prayed for. Order Date :- 15.12.2023 AK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad