- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 14 December 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 43177/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 43177 of 2023 Petitioner :- Uttar Pradesh Apradh Niyantran Evam Sevapath Nyas And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhinav Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Anand Prakash Paul Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,Acting Chief Justice Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
¶1The petitioners have challenged the order dated 22.09.2023 passed by the Vice Chairman, Kanpur Development Authority, Kanpur Nagar rejecting the claim of the petitioners assailing the cancellation of their lease.
¶2Learned counsel for the parties state that in identical facts and circumstances, this Court in Writ C No. 37732 of 2023 (Rakesh Dwivedi vs State of U.P. and 3 others) decided on 01.11.2023, has relegated the petitioner therein to the remedy of revision before the State Government under section 41 (3) of U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973. The Court has further directed that no coercive measures would be taken for a period of five weeks while the revision remains pending before the State Government.
¶3The operative part of the order dated 01.11.2023 is as follows: "5. Without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to file revision before the State Government within three weeks from today. The petitioner would also be entitled to file application for interim relief before the Revisional Authority, who shall decide the same within a period of two weeks from the date of filing of the revision.
¶6Till five weeks from today, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner."
¶4Accordingly, the instant petition is also disposed of in same terms. Order Date :- 15.12.2023 Sazia (Kshitij Shailendra,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,A.C.J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.