- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 14 December 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 42421/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42421 of 2023 Petitioner :- Tayyaba Jeelani Respondent :- Central B Oard Of Secondary Education And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Saurabh Yadav,Upendra Bharti Counsel for Respondent :- Dhananjay Awasthi Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The record reveals that notice of this petition has been received by the Office of Shri Dhananjay Awasthi, learned counsel for the respondent, but when the matter is taken up, nobody appears on behalf of respondent nos. 2 & 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner submitted an application dated 23.09.2023 for correcting the name of his father, but till date, no order has been passed thereon. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being finally disposed of at this stage without calling for a counter affidavit. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2 to decide the petitioner's aforesaid application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. The petitioner is also granted liberty to file a fresh application along with all relevant documents within a period of one week from today. It is made clear that the Court has not adjudicated the claim of the petitioner on merits. Order Date :- 15.12.2023 Amit Mishra High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.