Bunela Miyan @ Quyamuddin Ansari v. State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 86 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 43250 of 2023 Applicant :- Bunela Miyan @ Quyamuddin Ansari Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Satish Mohan Tiwari,Rajesh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶2This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the order dated 22.1.2021 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 6037 of 1993 (State Vs. Bunela Miyan and others) arising out of case crime No. 200 of 1993, under Section 489B IPC, Police Station-Kotwali, District-Mau, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mau.

¶3After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant has made a statement at the Bar, on instructions, that he does not want to press other prayers made in the instant application and states that the applicant is ready to appear before the court below and seek his bail and that his release be considered in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51.

¶4Per contra, learned AGA states that he has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant for not pressing the other prayers made in the instant application.

¶5In view of the above, in case the applicant appears before the court below within three weeks from today and seeks bail, his release be considered as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law.

¶6With the aforesaid observations, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed off. Order Date :- 16.12.2023 KU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad