Suraj v. State of U.P

Court No. - 25 Through Video Conferencing from Lucknow Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 50056 of 2023 Applicant :- Suraj Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Abhay Raj Yadav,Neeraj Pandey,Raj Kumar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶2It is argued that on a similar role assigned to the accused, they have been enlarged on bail vide separate bail orders which are on record from Annexure - 14 onwards. The criminal antecedent of the applicant has been explained in Para - 28 of the bail application.

¶3Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

¶4Considering the fact that the allegations levelled against the applicant are similar to the one levelled against the co-accused who have been enlarged on bail and the recovery of the money from the applicant is also contrary to the mandate of Section 100 Cr.P.C., as such, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.

¶5Let the applicant Suraj be released on bail in FIR No.232 of 2023, under Section 392, 411 IPC, P.S. Nagla Khangar, District Firozabad on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. Order Date :- 16.12.2023 nishant High Court of Judicature at Allahabad