Ram Kumar Gupta@ Raj Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another

Court No. - 72 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 13638 of 2023 Applicant :- Ram Kumar Gupta @ Raj Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶1List has been revised.

¶2Heard Sri Sanjay Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ashutosh Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the record.

¶3The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in F.I.R./Case Crime No. 83 of 2023, under Sections 363, 366, 368, 506 of IPC, Police Station Khesraha, District Siddharth Nagar, with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail.

¶4As per prosecution story, the FIR was instituted against unknown person regarding the abscondance of minor daughter of the informant since

21.04.2023 at 04:00 PM.

¶5Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the applicant is maliciously being prosecuted in the present case due to ulterior motive and has apprehension of his arrest. Learned counsel has further stated that he is not named in the FIR. He is the Gram Pradhan of the village. The criminal history of one case assigned to the applicant regarding the same girl who is stated to have been missing four months ago and in the said case, the applicant has been exonerated which is but evident from Annexure No.3 to the affidavit filed along with anticipatory bail application. Except the two FIRs instituted by one and the same informant against unknown person, the applicant has no previous criminal history. In the instant case, the informant has filed an affidavit before the police authorities stating that the applicant has nothing to do with the said offence.

¶6Several other submissions have been made on behalf of the applicant to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against him. The circumstances which, as per counsel, led to the false implication of the applicant have also been touched upon at length. In case, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed, he will not misuse the liberty and shall cooperate with trial.

¶7On the other hand, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail but unable to dispute the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶8Considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, nature of accusations and antecedents of the applicant, the applicant is liable to be enlarged on anticipatory bail in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of "Sushila Aggarwal Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (2020) 5 SCC 1". The future contingencies regarding the anticipatory bail being granted to applicant shall also be taken care of as per the aforesaid judgment of Apex Court.

¶9Without expressing any opinion upon ultimate merits of the case either ways which may adversely affect the trial of the case, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed.

¶10In the event of arrest of the applicant, Ram Kumar Gupta @ Raj Kumar involved in the aforesaid case crime number, shall be released on anticipatory bail till the conclusion of trial on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Presiding Officer/Court Concerned, with the conditions that:- i. that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; ii. that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; iii. that the applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the court; iv. that the applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during the trial; v. that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness; vi. that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed unless personal presence is exempted;

¶11In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court concerned shall have the liberty to cancel the bail granted to the applicant.

¶12It is made clear that observations made in granting anticipatory bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. (Justice Krishan Pahal) Order Date :- 16.12.2023 Siddhant High Court of Judicature at Allahabad