- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 31 May 2023
- Bench
- Dinesh Pathak
- Case no.
- WRIC 1001500/2005
Judgment
Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1001500 of 2005 Petitioner :- M/S Mohan Breweries And Distilleries Ltd.And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P.Through Secretary Mandi Samities And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Mohan Saggi,K.S. Pawar,Vikas Budhwar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,N.C.Mehrotra,V.D. Mandhyan Hon'ble Dinesh Pathak,J.
¶1List revised.
¶2None is present for the petitioner. However, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 and 3 as well as learned Standing counsel are present.
¶3While entertaining the instant writ petition, following order dated 04.03.2022 has been passed by this Court:- "1. Two counsels, representing the petitioners, have been elevated to the Bench.
¶2Let card notice be issued to the petitioners to engage some other counsel, if they so like.
¶3Let the matter be listed after three weeks along with office report regarding service of card notice."
¶4Office report dated 30.05.2022 and the order dated
31.05.2022 passed by the Joint Registrar (J)(N) reveals that notices were issued to the petitioners. However, undelivered envelop has been received back with the remark of Left RTS.
¶5Perusal of the record reveals that same name and address of the petitioners have been mentioned on the envelop sent to the petitioner through registered post, which have been mentioned in the array of parties of the instant writ petition. There is no another address of the petitioners available on the record for the purposes of sending notice to them. Till date no one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners to pursue the writ petition.
¶6In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served to keep this writ petition pending.
¶7As such, instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Order Date :- 31.5.2023 Pkb/ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.