Ramapati Verma v. Civil Judge (Junior Division) , F.T.C. , Ambedkar Nagar and Others

Court No. - 9 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5155 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ramapati Verma Respondent :- Civil Judge (Junior Division) , F.T.C. , Ambedkar Nagar And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. The petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for writ of mandamus commanding the opposite parties concerned to not interfere in the peaceful possession of the petitioner on the land Gata No. 85, situated Mauja Fattepur, pargana and tehsil Akbarpur, District Ambedkar Nagar. It appears that the petitioner had filed Regular Suit No. 996 of 2012 (Rampati Verma Vs. Keshav Ram) and he was granted interim injunction of status quo vide order dated 18.12.2012. The said suit came to be dismissed for non-prosecution. The petitioner came to know about the dismissal of the suit during the Court's vacation therefore, he has approached this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will move an application for restoration on the first day of the opening of the Court i.e. on 03.07.2023. Considering the overall facts, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Superintendent of Police, Ambedkar Nagar to ensure that the petitioner is not dispossessed from the land Gata No. 85, situated Mauja Fattepur, pargana and tehsil Akbarpur, District Ambedkar Nagar till 03.07.2023. On

03.07.2023, the petitioner will move an application for restoration of Regular Suit No. 996 of 2012. Order Date :- 21.6.2023 DiVYa High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench