VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ram Kewal Mishra v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. and Others

Dismissed on merits/Rejected
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
22 June 2023
Bench
Dinesh Kumar Singh, Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi
Case no.
5113/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 9 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5113 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ram Kewal Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Dhar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh,Rishabh Kapoor Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel, representing the respondent nos. 1 and 2-State Authorities, as well as Mr. Mohan Singh, learned counsel representing the respondent no. 4-Gram Sabha.

¶2By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has sought the following reliefs:- "[I] Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 8.6.2023 expeditiously by a speaking and reasoned order as contained in ANNEXURE NO. 1 to this writ petition. [II] Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 2 to restrain the opp. parties NO. 3 and 4 from making construction of Panki Ki Tanki on the land of petitioner i.e. Gata No.188 [Old Gata No. 128] situate at Village Palpur Pargana Khandasa, Tehsil Milkipur, District Ayodhya under Jal Jiwan Mission and contruct the Pani Ki Tanki on the land of Gata No.1308 as selected. [III} Issue any other writ......................... [IV] Allow this........................................."

¶3The land in question where tank for drinking water for villagers is being constructed is a Banjar Land. The petitioner has no right, title or interest over the land in question where the water-tank is being constructed.

¶4Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was given the land in question on lease, however, there is no record of such lease having been executed in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner cannot claim possession over the Gaon-Sabha land as per revenue record. The land, in question, is recorded as a Banjar Land. We find no ground to interfere in the present petition or to grant any relief, as sought by the petitioner.

¶5Thus, this petition, being devoid of merit and substance, is hereby dismissed at this stage. [S.Q.H. RIZVI, J.] [D.K. SINGH, J.] Order Date :- 22.6.2023 MVS/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.