Rinku @ Ravikesh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Dpett. of Home Lko

Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6722 of 2023 Applicant :- Rinku @ Ravikesh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Dpett. Of Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Amar Nath Dubey,Anil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶2The present bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No.169 of 2019 under Sections 354, 363 and 511 I.P.C. and Section 7/8 POCSO Act, Police Station-Baghrai, District-Pratapgarh, with the prayer to enlarge him on bail.

¶3Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that accused-applicant is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in the present case and he is in jail since 17.03.2023. He further submits that co-accused, namely-Indrajeet and Pujan @ Dinesh Gautam has already been granted bail by the Coordinate Bench this Court, vide order dated 21.04.2022 and 20.03.2023 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.2881 of 2022 and 13936 of 2022, respectively. In these circumstances, the applicant is also entitled for bail. In case of being enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶4Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the applicant but has fairly conceded that similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court.

¶5Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. and going through the record as well as bail orders of co-accused persons, this Court deems it appropriate to enlarge/release accused-applicant on bail. The bail application is allowed on the ground of parity.

¶6Let the applicant-Rinku @ Ravikesh, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions.

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the date fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A IPC.

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C., may be issued and if applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A IPC.

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the Trial Court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶7In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) Order Date :- 23.6.2023 Piyush/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench