VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Santosh Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Food and Civil Supplies, Lko. and 2 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
26 June 2023
Bench
Subhash Chandra Sharmaauthor
Case no.
5216/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5216 of 2023 Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Food And Civil Supplies, Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satish Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.

¶1Heard Sri Satish Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.

¶2The present writ petition has been filed seeking a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the part of order dated 24.04.2023 passed by the opposite party no.2 in appeal No. D57/2023 (Santosh Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and others), under Section 13(3) of the Essential Commodities (Regulation of Sale and Distribution Control) Order, 2016.

¶3It is contented by learned counsel for the petitioner that in this case against the impugned order, an appeal is pending before the opposite party no.2 i.e. Joint Commissioner (Food), Lucknow Division, Lucknow since 31.03.2023 which was admitted and original records were summoned but impugned order was not stayed. He also relied on the ratio given in the case of Radha Rani Cold Storage Pvt. Vs. U.P. State Cold Storage Tribunal and others; 2009 (27) LCD 1391 and urged that the Commissioner ought to have suspended the lower court's order during pendency of the appeal otherwise the purpose would be frustrated, therefore, requested to stay the order in question in appeal. He also cited the order passed by co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Writ C No.5988 of 2022 dated 06.09.2022, in which, the order of cancellation of license of the fair price shop of the petitioner was stayed by this Court in appeal pending before the Deputy Commissioner and direction was given to decide the appeal expeditiously within a period of six weeks.

¶4Learned A.C.S.C. for the State could not dispute the aforesaid position of law.

¶5In view of ratio laid down in the aforesaid case and the direction passed by this Court as aforesaid, it is directed that the order of cancellation of the license of fair price shop shall remain stayed till the decision taken by the opposite party no.2 i.e. Joint Commissioner (Food), Lucknow Division, Lucknow, who is expected to decide the appeal expeditiously, say within a period of six weeks from today.

¶6With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 26.6.2023 Saurabh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.