Vinay Shankar Srivastava v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Finance and Ors

Court No. - 8 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9002 of 2019 Petitioner :- Vinay Shankar Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Finance And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.

¶1Heard Shri Ram Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for petitioner and Shri Diwakar Singh, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents.

¶2The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking quashing of the order dated 12.03.2018 passed in pursuance of the judgment and order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in Contempt No.1344 of 2017 for deciding the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law.

¶3The petitioner got retired in the year 2015. He filed the first writ petition in the year 2017 claiming benefit of seniority and Assured Career Progression. As per the impugned order, the petitioner has been paid all his retiral dues as admissible to him.

¶4At this belated stage, such a claim for fixing his seniority and granting him Assured Career Progression cannot be entertained.

¶5In view thereof, I find no merit and substance in the present petition, which is hereby dismissed. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) Order Date :- 6.7.2023 Piyush/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench