VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Smt. Sunita Devi v. Union of India Thru. Secy. Ministry of Railway New Delhi and 4 Others

Dismissed on merits/Rejected
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
14 July 2023
Bench
Dinesh Kumar Singhauthor
Case no.
4996/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 8 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4996 of 2023 Petitioner :- Smt. Sunita Devi Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Railway New Delhi And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vikas Verma Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.

¶1By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "a. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 2 to 4 to enter the name of petitioner and her daughter namely Priyanka in service book of opp. party no. 5 and further direct to the opposite parties to provide facilities related railway, by which the petitioner is wedded wife of opp. party no. 5, in the interest of justice. b. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 2 and 3 to consider and decide the representation dated 18.05.2023, as contained in Annexure No. 9 to this writ petition. c. issue any other......................................... d. Allow the writ........................................."

¶2Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. S.B. Pande, learned Senior Advocate/Additional Solicitor General of India, assisted by Mr. Varun Pandey, Advocate for respondent-Central Authorities, this Court does not find any ground to grant any of the reliefs sought by the petitioner. Hence, this writ petition, being devoid of merit and substance, is hereby dismissed at this stage itself. [D.K. SINGH, J.] Order Date :- 14.7.2023 MVS/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.