- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 14 July 2023
- Bench
- Dinesh Kumar Singh
- Case no.
- WRIA 2001483/2014
Judgment
Court No. - 8 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2001483 of 2014 Petitioner :- Ram Ratan Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Handloom And Textiles Lko. And Counsel for Petitioner :- Manish Kumar,Atul Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Shukla,Raj Kumar Upadhyaya (R.K.Upadhyaya),Rajnish Kumar Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
¶1Despite the matter being listed peremptorily, learned counsel for the petitioner is not present, though Mr. Raj Kumar Upadhyaya, learned counsel for respondent - U.P. Public Service Commission, and Mr. Ram Pratap Singh Chauhan, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for respondent - State Authorities, are present to assist the Court. With their assistance, this Court proceeds to decide this petition.
¶2By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has challenged the order dated
29.08.2014 and the consequential order dated 26.09.2014 whereby he has been communicated that in view of provisions of the U.P. Government Department Statistics Rules, 2012 his claim for promotion under the rescind Rules of 1993 cannot be accepted.
¶3Once the service condition of the petitioner is governed by the Rules of 2012 and not by the Rules of 1993, the claim of the petitioner, in this petition, is wholly misconceived.
¶4DISMISSED. [D.K. SINGH, J.] Order Date :- 14.7.2023 MVS/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.