- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 17 August 2023
- Bench
- Pritinker Diwaker, Rajan Roy
- Case no.
- 6744/2023
Judgment
Chief Justice's Court Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6744 of 2023 Petitioner :- M/S D.S. Hospital Through Its Manager Ajeet Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Medical And Health And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Verma Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,Chief Justice Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J.
¶1Heard Sri Ajay Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ashok Kumar Verma, learned counsel for U.P.P.C.B. and Sri V.P. Nag, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
¶2This petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature CERRIORARI thereby quashing the impugned order dated 12.07.2023 passed by the Opposite Party No. 3 and 4, contained as Annexure no. I to the Writ Petition.
(ii)To Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of CERRIORARI thereby quashing the Inspection Report dated 23.05.2023 after summoning the same from its custodian.
(iii) To issue any other writ, order or section which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case
(iv) To award the cost of this petition in favour of the petitioner."
¶3The only ground pressed at this stage of argument by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the order has civil consequences and is prejudicial to the petitioner who runs a hospital but it has been passed without any opportunity of hearing
¶4On being confronted, Sri Ashok Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the Pollution Control Board fairly submitted that no notice for opportunity of hearing was given.
¶5In our opinion, this is sufficient for quashing the impugned order. We, accordingly, quash the impugned order dated
12.07.2023, however, with liberty to the opposite parties to initiate fresh proceedings and take a fresh decision if they so desire but after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and providing material adverse to him which is proposed to be considered.
¶6Accordingly, the petition is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 17.8.2023 Shanu/- (Rajan Roy,J.) (Pritinker Diwaker,CJ.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.