VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Dr. Sudhir Kumar Srivastava v. State of U.P. Thru. Chief Secy., Govt. of U.P., Lko. (Being President of S.G.P.G.I.M.S.) and 3 Ors

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
10 October 2023
Bench
Abdul Moinauthor
Case no.
7788/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7788 of 2023 Petitioner :- Dr. Sudhir Kumar Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Chief Secy., Govt. Of U.P., Lko. (Being President Of S.G.P.G.I.M.S.) And 3 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Umesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shubham Tripathi Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 to 3 and Shri Subham Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondents no. 3 & 4. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is being finally decided. The instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondents to promote the petitioner on the post of Chief Medical Social Service Officer by giving relaxation in requisite period of experience / service as per the notification dated 10.03.2006 and the decisions taken thereon and thereafter to pay the consequential benefit including the pensionery benefits. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the reliefs sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before the respondent no.3 i.e. Director, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science, Lucknow which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsel for the respondents have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.3 then respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and the relevant rules within a further period of six weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. Order Date :- 10.10.2023 J.K. Dinkar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.