- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 10 October 2023
- Bench
- Narendra Kumar Johari, Sangeeta Chandra
- Case no.
- 7819/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7819 of 2023 Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Saxena Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohammad Alam Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. who appears on behalf of the State Respondents.
¶2This petition has been filed with the following main prayers:- "i. to issue a writ order or direction in nature of certiorari to quash the FIR on 11-9-2017 in case crime No. 760/2017 U/s 467,468,471,420 IPC, Police Station. - Hazratganj District Lucknow by the opposite party no.4 contained as Annexure No.1 to the writ petition so for it relates to the petitioners. ii. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties not to adopt coercive method against the petitioner on the basis of in in case crime No. 760/2017 U/s 467,468,471,420 IPC, Police Station-Hazratganj District-Lucknow by the opposite party no.4."
¶3It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the preliminary fact finding inquiry was done in the matter by the Inspector, C.B.C.I.D. and a report has been submitted on 16.08.2017, a copy of which has been filed as annexure to the writ petition.
¶4It has also been submitted that in the said report, there is no specific allegations against the petitioner.
¶5This Court has perused the F.I.R. and also the report dated
16.08.2017 and finds that the petitioner is the beneficiary of the alleged forgery carried out by the other accused.
¶6This Court finds no good ground to show interference in the impugned F.I.R.
¶7The writ petition stands dismissed. Order Date :- 10.10.2023/DS High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.