- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 10 October 2023
- Bench
- Manish Mathur
- Case no.
- 7763/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 20 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7763 of 2023 Petitioner :- Gautam Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Adarsh Kumar Maurya,Shubham Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manish Mishra Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties.
¶2Petition has been filed challenging order dated 29.05.2023 whereby appeal preferred by petitioner against suspension order has been rejected.
¶3Learned State counsel however submits that as would be evident from the impugned order itself that inquiry proceedings were initiated against petitioner whereafter punishment order has also been passed, which has not been challenged by petitioner and challenge has been raised only to the suspension order.
¶4In view of such submissions, learned counsel for petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to file appeal against the punishment order.
¶5Considering aforesaid facts and submissions, petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to petitioner to challenge the punishment order in accordance with law. In case such an appeal is preferred within a period of ten days' from today, the same shall be considered and decided within a period of two months thereafter. Order Date :- 10.10.2023 Subodh/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.