VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mohammad Asfak v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Lko and 2 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
10 October 2023
Bench
Manish Mathurauthor
Case no.
7839/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 20 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7839 of 2023 Petitioner :- Mohammad Asfak Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the opposite parties for grant benefit of selection grade/promotional pay scale/A.C.P./increments to petitioner on completion of 27 years satisfactory services. Learned State Counsel however on the basis of instructions submits that petitioner has not yet been regularized in service due to which he is not eligible for the aforesaid benefits. Learned counsel for petitioner however has disputed the aforesaid facts with submission that petitioner has in fact been regularized in service and is entitled to the aforesaid benefits. Considering the fact that adjudication of petitioner's grievance would require factual aspects, therefore liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before the opposite party No.3 i.e. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Teshil Hasanganj, District Unnao with regard to his grievance. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided by a reasoned and speaking order within with period of eight weeks from the date a copy of this order is produced before the said authority. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 10.10.2023 prabhat High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.