- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 10 October 2023
- Bench
- Rajesh Singh Chauhan
- Case no.
- 2954/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 4 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2954 of 2023 Applicant :- Ramesh Chandra Verma Opposite Party :- Rakesh Singh Managing Director, U.P. State Bridge Corp. Ltd Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Shukla Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner and Mr. Shishir Jain, Advocate, who has put in appearance and filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of sole contemnor - opposite party. Let the same be taken on record.
¶2Mr. Shishir Jain, learned counsel appearing for the sole contemnor - opposite party, has produced a copy of Office Memo dated 07.10.2023 passed/issued by the Managing Director, U.P. State Bridge Corporation Limited. Let the same be taken on record. He has stated that in compliance of the order of the writ-Court dated 03.02.2023 passed in Writ-A No.1033 of 2023 (Ramesh Chandra Verma Vs. U.P. State Bridge Corporation Limited and others) representation of the petitioner has been decided and, a copy whereof has been provided to the applicant-petitioner.
¶3In view of aforesaid development, nothing remains to be adjudicated in this contempt petition.
¶4Accordingly, this contempt petition is hereby dismissed. However, it is always open to the applicant-petitioner to challenge the order dated 07.10.2023 passed/issued by the Managing Director, U.P. State Bridge Corporation Limited, strictly in accordance with law.
¶5Notice, if any, stands discharged. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 10.10.2023 MVS/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.