Harnam Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko. U.P. and 4 Others

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8766 of 2023 Petitioner :- Harnam Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko. U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Surendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. Admittedly, the petitioner has filed a suit against the private respondent no. 5 in which, his application for injunction has been rejected. Thereafter, he has also filed an appeal no. 361 of 2022 (Harnam Yadav Vs. Maiku Lal and others), which is pending before the Court of District Judge, Faizabad. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be substantially met in case appeal of the petitioner is considered and decided in a time bound manner. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the same. Writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the court concerned before which Appeal No. 361 of 2022 is pending to consider and decide the appeal expeditiously in accordance with law after hearing all the parties concerned. (Manish Kumar,J) (Vivek Chaudhary,J) Order Date :- 11.10.2023 Ashish High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench