VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mohd. Mazhar Khan v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home, U.P. Lucknow and Another

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
11 October 2023
Bench
Rajeev Singhauthor
Case no.
9913/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9913 of 2023 Applicant :- Mohd. Mazhar Khan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home, U.P. Lucknow And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Lal Bahadur Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

¶1Vakalatnama filed by Mohd. Imran, Advocate on behalf of the opposite party No.2 is taken on record.

¶2Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P., learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and perused the record.

¶3This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the impugned charge-sheet dated 24.12.2020 arising out of Case Crime No.217 of 2020 U/s 354, 452 I.P.C., Police Station-Hanswar, District-Ambedkar Nagar as well as impugned summoning order dated 05.04.2021 passed in Crl. Case No.3691 of 2023 and for quashing entire proceedings of Crl. Case No.3691 of 2023.

¶4Learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned counsel for opposite party No.2 jointly submitted that vide order dated

21.08.2023 a direction was given to the court concerned to verify the factum of compromise executed by the parties. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, learned court concerned had verified the contents of compromise.

¶5Learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 jointly submitted that the parties have entered into compromise, which has duly been verified by the court concerned vide report/order dated 21.09.2023.

¶6Learned A.G.A. has fairly conceded that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified by the court concerned.

¶7Hon'ble Apex Court in catena of decisions has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice as has been held in Gian Singh Vs State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties.

¶8In view of the aforesaid and the fact that parties do not want to pursue the case any further, the matter is purely of personal nature, which has been mutually settled between the parties by way of the compromise, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further.

¶9For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed and the impugned charge-sheet dated 24.12.2020 arising out of Case Crime No.217 of 2020 U/s 354, 452 I.P.C., Police Station-Hanswar, District-Ambedkar Nagar as well as impugned summoning order dated 05.04.2021 passed in Crl. Case No.3691 of 2023 and entire proceedings of Crl. Case No.3691 of 2023 are hereby quashed.

¶10Office is directed to communicate this order to trial court forthwith. Order Date :- 11.10.2023 Arpan High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.