- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 11 October 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 3961/2005
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3961 of 2005 Petitioner :- Ramesh Kumar Objection Filed Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Urban Planning And Dev. And 4 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashish Chaturvedi,N.K. Seth Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Ashish Chaturvedi, learned counsel for respondent no.1.
¶2After arguing at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has a right for enhancement of award as the award passed in his favour is very meager and disproportionate to the market value and money paid to the owners of the land.
¶3The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the award by way of reference or under Section 28-A of the U.P. Land Acquisition Act.
¶4The writ petition is consigned to record. [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 11.10.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.