- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 11 October 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 7277/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7277 of 2023 Petitioner :- Pradeep Pathak Alias Pradeep Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Energy, Govt. Of U.P. Civil Secrt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anurag Pathak,Sarojani Misra,Sonal Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Neera Yadav Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Neera Yadav, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 & 3. Petitioner has approached this Court challenging the recovery certificate raised against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent-Corporation on instructions states that this is a matter with regard to electricity theft wherein a provisional bill was raised against the petitioner and thereafter a final bill was also raised against the petitioner. Both the bills were duly served upon the petitioner. Today before this Court, the copy of the aforesaid bills are also provided to the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the discussions made hereinabove, the petitioner is at liberty to file an appeal under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Writ petition is consigned to record, with the aforesaid liberty. Order Date :- 11.10.2023 Nitesh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.