- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 12 October 2023
- Bench
- Saurabh Lavania
- Case no.
- 5176/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 18 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5176 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Tripathi Respondent :- Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tarabganj, Gonda And 26 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Madhav Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent(s) is dispensed with. Present petition has been filed seeking expeditious disposal of Case No.T202208300600241 filed under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 which is pending before respondent No.1. Taking note of the fact as indicated in the present petition that the case, in issue, filed under Section 116 of the Code of 2006 is pending consideration before the opposite party No.1 since 2022 as also that as per Rule 109(10) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, a suit for partition should be decided preferably within a period of six months, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the present petition pending. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.1-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tarabganj, Gonda to consider and decide the Case No.T202208300600241, most expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 12.10.2023/Mohit Singh/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.