- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 12 October 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 8814/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8814 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ram Abhilash Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayat Raj Secrt. U.P. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rishi Kumar Tripathi Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Sri Rishi Kumar Tripathi, Advocate has filed power on behalf of respondent no.2 today and the same is taken on record.
¶2Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents and Sri Rishi Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent no.2.
¶3Appropriate orders are already passed by the District Magistrate, Pratapgarh on petitioners' application under Section 95(1)(G) of U.P. Panchayati Raj Act read with rules of 1997.
¶4Learned counsel for petitioner fairly concedes that the grievance raised is in favour of public at large and, therefore, a P.I.L. petition would be maintainable.
¶5In view thereof, the writ petition is consigned to record with liberty to petitioner to move appropriate P.I.L. petition before the appropriate Court. Order Date :- 12.10.2023 Arti/- [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.