VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Anoop Kumar Yadav and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
12 October 2023
Bench
Shree Prakash Singhauthor
Case no.
9959/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 28 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9959 of 2023 Applicant :- Anoop Kumar Yadav And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. Sri Nauman Asif, Advocate has put in appearance by filing Vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no.2 and the same is taken on record. Heard Sri Vivek Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Sushil Kumar Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State, Sri Nauman Asif, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and perused the record. By means of the instant application, the applicants have prayed for quashing of the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 86305 of 2023, State Versus Anoop Kumar Yadav and Others, in Case Crime No. 902 of 2021, under sections 498-A,323,504,506 of I.P.C. & Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station-Chinhat, District-Lucknow, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Room No. 27,Lucknow. Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the matter pertains to the matrimonial dispute and due to some misunderstanding, the instant FIR was lodged and thereafter the parties sat together and they have settled their dispute and that too has been reduced in writing as a compromise deed dated

08.09.2023. Adding his arguments, he submits that now the parties have put their all disputes at rest by way of executing compromise deed and thus further criminal proceedings against the present applicants would be a futile exercise and amount to harassment of the applicants. Adding his arguments, he also submits that this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 25.09.2023 has referred the matter for compromise verification in Application U/S 482 Cr.P.C. No. 9267 of 2023 and in compliance of the aforesaid order, both the parties have appeared before the court below and the compromise deed dated 08.09.2023 has been verified in presence of all concerned parties and the order of verification was passed on 03.10.2023 by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Court No. 27, Lucknow. He next added that now the matter has been compromised between the parties, and as such the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 86305 of 2023 (State of U.P. versus Anoop Kumar Yadav and Others) arising out of Case Crime No. 902 of 2021, under Sections 498-A, 323,504,506 IPC and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station-Chinhat, District - Lucknow, may be quashed. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has also supported the version of the applicants and submits that the parties have entered into compromise deed and now there is no dispute in between the parties and thus the criminal proceeding against the applicant may be dropped. On the other hand, learned AGA appearing for the State has no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I find that compromise has been entered into between the parties on 08.09.2023 and said compromise has been verified on 03.10.2023 and, now, as per the statement of learned counsel for the parties, they do not want to press the aforementioned State versus Anoop Kumar Yadav and others, arising out of aforementioned Case Crime No. 902 of 2021. In view of the above, as the applicants and opposite parties have entered into compromise on

08.09.2023 and no grievance remains to be agitated and as such, further criminal proceedings in the aforementioned criminal case are liable to be set aside in view of the Judgements of the Apex Court rendered in B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another (2003)4 SCC 675; Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation[2008)9 SCC 677]; Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303; and Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab ( 2014) 6 SCC 466. Resultantly, the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 86305 of 2023 (State of U.P. versus Anoop Kumar Yadav and Others) arising out of Case Crime No. 902 of 2021, under Sections 498-A, 323,504,506 IPC and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station-Chinhat, District - Lucknow, are hereby quashed. The compromise deed shall be part of this order. Consequences to be followed. The application is allowed accordingly. Order Date :- 12.10.2023 AKS High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.