- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 12 October 2023
- Bench
- Abdul Moin
- Case no.
- 7595/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7595 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ratan Kumar Respondent :- Director Nagar Vikas Anubhag Lko And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahesh Chandra Shukla,Anand Mani Tripathi,Raj Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ajay Kumar Singh Raj Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1 to 3 and Shri Ajay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondents no. 4 to 5. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is being finally decided. The instant writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to promote the petitioner on a class III post. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the reliefs sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before the respondent no.5 i.e. Chairman, Nagar Panchayat, Kadipur, District Sultanpur which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned Counsel for the respondents has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.5 then respondent no.5 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and the relevant rules within a further period of four weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. Order Date :- 12.10.2023 J.K. Dinkar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.