- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 12 October 2023
- Bench
- Rajnish Kumar
- Case no.
- 5194/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5194 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ghanshyam Respondent :- Civil Judge (J.D.), Kadipur, Sultanpur And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Shukla,Indrajeet Shukla Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. Heard Sri Pradeep Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for petitioner. In view of the order proposed to be passed this Court does not deem it necessary to issue notice to respondents as their interest would be well protected by the order passed by this Court. By means of the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "(i) Direct the Opposite Party No.1/Civil Judge (J.D.) Kadipur Sultanpur to decide Regular Suit No.406/2015, titled as Shyam Bihari versus Ghanshyam and counter claim filed in it on 27.10.2017, within specific time frame preferably within six months contained in Annexure No. 1 and 3, to this petition,
(ii) Issue any other direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper may also be kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner." This court on administrative side has already issued directions to the court below to obtain zero pendency of cases which are more than five years old. In view of directions already issued on administrative side, this court is not inclined to pass any further order on judicial side. However, it is always open for the petitioner to move appropriate application before the court before which the matter is pending for expeditious hearing. In case any such application is moved within a week from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of within two weeks thereafter and endeavour shall be made to decide the Suit within a time frame. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 12.10.2023 Akanksha High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.