VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mohammad Jakariya v. Union of India Thru. Its Zonal Director, Narcotics Control Bureau Lko

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
12 October 2023
Bench
Rajeev Singhauthor
Case no.
9881/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9881 of 2023 Applicant :- Mohammad Jakariya Opposite Party :- Union Of India Thru. Its Zonal Director, Narcotics Control Bureau Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Ayodhya Prasad Mishra A.P. Mishra,Jaylaxmi Upadhyay,Rituraj Mishra,Shesh Ram Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- Sajeet Singh Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the private respondent as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶2Present application has been moved by the applicant to provide him at least one months' time to surrender in the Court of Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.4/Special Judge (N.D.P.S. Act), Lakhimpur Kheri in compliance of judgment and order dated 29.09.2023 passed in Special Case No.35/2016; Union of India Vs. Gautam Das and Ors. vide N.C.B. Case No.6/2016 U/S 8/20/29 of N.D.P.S. Act and till then order of non-bailable warrant issued by trial court dated

29.09.2023 be kept in abeyance.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that on

29.09.2023, the case in question was listed for delivery of judgment, as on the said date, his mother was fallen ill, therefore, he was busy in her treatment and requested to his counsel to inform the trial court with the prayer of adjournment, as on the said date, lawyers were also abstaining from judicial work, therefore, no one put in appearance on behalf of the applicant and the judgment was delivered on 29.09.2023 and applicant was convicted under Section 8/20/29 of N.D.P.S. Act, thereafter, the case was listed on 30.09.2023 for hearing on sentence, as the lawyers were abstaining from judicial work, therefore, the request of the applicant was not made before the trial court and the sentence order was also passed on

30.09.2023.

¶4Learned counsel for the applicant drew attention of the Court on the documents related to the treatment of mother of the applicant and requested that at least 10 days' time may be granted to him for appearing before the trial court.

¶5Shri Sajeet Singh, learned counsel for the private respondent has no objection on the aforesaid prayer of the applicant that he will appear before the trial court within a period of ten days.

¶6Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, going through the contents of application, as well as other relevant documents, the application is disposed of with the direction to the applicant to appear before the trial court on

26.10.2023 at 10:30.

¶7Till 26.10.2023, non-bailable warrant dated 29.09.2023 issued by the trial court against the applicant shall be kept in abeyance. Order Date :- 12.10.2023 V. Sinha High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.