VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Girija Shankar Dixit v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Govt. Civil Secrt. Lko

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
12 October 2023
Bench
Subhash Vidyarthiauthor
Case no.
2228/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2228 of 2023 Applicant :- Girija Shankar Dixit Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Govt. Civil Secrt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Akhilendra Singh,Anurag Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶1Heard Sri Akhilendra Singh, the learned counsel for the applicant, Ms. Ankita Tripathi, the learned AGA for the State and perused the records.

¶2The instant application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail for the applicant in Case Crime No. 6 of 2021, under Sections 409, 120-B IPC, Police Station SIT, District Lucknow.

¶3The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an FIR lodged by an Inspector of Police against 11 named persons, including the applicant, and some unnamed builders and contractors etc., in furtherance of a report submitted by Special Investigating Team alleging administrative and financial irregularities committed in 137 construction works.

¶4In the affidavit filed in support of the application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. It has been contended that the allegation against the applicant is of having committed irregularities in construction of boundary wall of Central Jail, Varanasi and residential quarters in Central Jail, Varanasi.

¶5The applicant was removed from services on 24.09.2014 and an order for recovery of Rs. 1,89,29,700/- was directed to be made from the applicant, which has been stayed by this Court vide order dated 17.10.2014 passed in Writ Petition No. 1456 (S/B) of 2014. The order dated 17.10.2014 is still in operation.

¶6In the affidavit filed in support of the anticipatory bail-application, it has been contended that the applicant is innocent, and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. Applicant's involvement in three other cases based on the same investigation report has been disclosed in para 31 of the affidavit filed in support of the application. The applicant is 68 year's old and a cardiac patient.

¶7The co-accused R.N. Yadav has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 04.10.2023 passed by this Court in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 2161 of 2023.

¶8The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.

¶9Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that works in question were carried out during 2003-04 to 2012-13; FIR has been lodged in the year 2021; That the applicant was posted as Resident Engineer/ Assistant Resident Engineer in Varanasi Unit-2 of UPRNNL until 30.04.2012 and without making any observations which may affect the outcome of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for granting anticipatory bail to the applicant.

¶10In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. In the event of arrest/ appearance of applicant-Girija Shankar Dixit before the learned Trial Court in the aforesaid case crime, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing personal bond and two solvent sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of S.H.O./Court concerned on the following conditions and subject to any other conditions that may be fixed by the Trial Court:

(i). That the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted;

(ii). That the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;

(iii). That the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. Order Date :- 12.10.2023 Pradeep/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.