VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Irfan v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
12 October 2023
Bench
Subhash Vidyarthiauthor
Case no.
12177/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12177 of 2023 Applicant :- Irfan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Afrin Bano,Mohammad Shamim Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶1Heard Ms. Afrin Bano, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Manish Kumar Pandey, the learned A.G.A.-I for the State and perused the records.

¶2The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.0460 of 2020, under Sections 394, 506 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Kandhai, District Pratapgarh.

¶3The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 15.10.2020 alleging a robbery committed by three unknown miscreants riding on a motorcycle.

¶4In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no previous criminal history.The applicant was arrested on 18.10.2020 in connection with Case Crime No.938 of 2020, under Sections 392, 411 I.P.C. Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Pratapgarh, in which he has been granted bail by means of an order dated

12.04.2021 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Pratapgarh.

¶5Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that after his arrest in the aforesaid case the applicant has been implicated in several other cases mentioned in para 14 of the affidavit. The applicant has been granted bail in five cases but he continues to remain in jail since 18.10.2020.

¶6Learned counsel for the applicant has further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the applicant or on his pointing out.

¶7The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.

¶8Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.

¶9Let the applicant-Irfan be released on bail in Case Crime No.0460 of 2020, under Sections 394, 506 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Kandhai, District Pratapgarh on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. Order Date :- 12.10.2023 Ram. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.