Kuldeep Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5047 of 2023 Applicant :- Kuldeep Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶1Heard Sri Vivek Chandra, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Rakesh Kumar Singh, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶2The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 988 of 2022, under Section 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506, 406 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Barabanki.

¶3The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of F.I.R. lodged on 17.09.2022 against 13 persons, including the applicant, by the informant, who introduce herself as a director of City Doors Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., alleging that she had purchased a piece of land from the applicant and similarly some other parts of land were purchased from two co-accused persons and thereafter the informant's company carved out plots in the land and sold the same to other persons. Subsequently, the informant came to know that the persons who had executed a sale deed in favour of the company were not owners of the land.

¶4In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case.

¶5The applicant's involvement in eight other cases has been disclosed in the supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant, in seven of which the applicant had been granted bail prior to filing of the instant bail application and in the remaining cases also he has been granted bail.

¶6The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer of the bail, but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.

¶7Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the F.I.R does not contain any particulars as to whom the land in question belong as per the informant and that the alleged true owner of the land has not come forward to file any F.I.R against the applicant and also that the applicant has already been granted bail in all the other cases, coupled with the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail since 20.09.2022 and without making any observations which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail.

¶8Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.

¶9Let the applicant-Kuldeep Yadav be released on bail in the aforesaid case, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to the following conditions: -

(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. . (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 12.10.2023 Ram. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench