Himanshu Bhatt Thru. Power of Attorney Harish Chandra Bhatt v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Nagar Vikas, U.P. Govt. Lko. and Others

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6539 of 2023 Petitioner :- Himanshu Bhatt Thru. Power Of Attorney Harish Chandra Bhatt Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Nagar Vikas, U.P. Govt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Baljeet Singh,Suneel Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Namit Sharma,Ratnesh Chandra,Shailendra Singh Chauhan Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and Sri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for the Lucknow Development Authority as well as Sri Shailendra Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the Nagar Nigam, Lucknow. Petitioner has approached this Court claiming that he is not provided complete 217.70 Square Meters of land situated at Pratap Bagh, Sector-F, Aliganj, Lucknow, which was allotted to his predecessors and thereafter purchased by him. Mr. Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for the Lucknow Development Authority states that on spot it was found that the land of the petitioner is somehow less by 2.24 Square Meters and the same is compensated by allotting further land to the petitioner towards the park side by carving out certain land from the said park. The possession of the said land is also available to be taken by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner shall take possession of the said land from the Lucknow Development Authority and as such his grievance would be sufÏciently met. The statements of both the counsel are taken on record. It goes without saying that no extra charges shall be taken from the petitioner further for compensating the said land by the Lucknow Development Authority. The writ petition is disposed of. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 12.10.2023 Arjun/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench