- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 13 October 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 8901/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8901 of 2023 Petitioner :- Mehtab Jahan And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jay Prakash Singh Vats,Ajay Kumar Soni Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Petitioner has approached this Court claiming that his agricultural land was demarcated under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and, thereafter, he was also put in possession in the year 2021. Now, certain private respondents are interfering in his possession and have also disturbed the boundary marks.
¶2Learned Standing Counsel states that the petitioner has statutory alternative remedy either to file an application under Section 227 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 or to file appropriate suit for injunction.
¶3With the aforesaid two alternative remedies available to the petitioner, petition is consigned to record with liberty to the petitioner to avail the same. . [Manish Kumar, J.] [Vivek Chaudhary, J.] Order Date :- 13.10.2023 -Amit K-High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.