- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 13 October 2023
- Bench
- Rajnish Kumar
- Case no.
- 5233/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5233 of 2023 Petitioner :- Susheela Singh @ Susheela Devi Respondent :- Civil Judge (Junior Division) Bahraich And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rama Kant Dixit,Swati Mishra Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard Ms. Swati Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner.
¶2Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed in this petition, the issuance of notice to the opposite parties is dispensed with.
¶3By means of the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "i. Issue a direction to the opposite party no.1 to ensure the expedite disposal of civil suit no.225/2016 Regular Suit no.174/2016, Ramesh Kumar and another versus Rajendra Prasad and ors for cancellation of sale deed which is pending before respondent no.1 as expeditious as possible or within a period as stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. ii. Any such other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper. iii. Allow the petition with cost."
¶4This court on administrative side has already issued directions to the court below for zero pendency of cases, which are more than five years old. In view of directions already issued on administrative side, this court is not inclined to pass any further order on judicial side.
¶5However, it is always open for the petitioner to move appropriate application before the court before which the matter is pending for expeditious hearing and disposal. In case any such application is moved within a week from today the same shall be considered and disposed of within two weeks thereafter and endeavour shall be made to decide the Suit within a time frame.
¶6With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Order Date :- 13.10.2023/Harshita High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.