- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 13 October 2023
- Bench
- Pankaj Bhatia
- Case no.
- WRIC 1000982/2014
Judgment
Court No. - 8 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1000982 of 2014 Petitioner :- Smt. Khairatan @ Khattan Respondent :- Additional District Judge Court No.2 Distt.Balrampur And Ors Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Pandey,Anil Kumar Pandey,Bajhul Quamar Siddiqui Counsel for Respondent :- Manish Kumar,Mohd. Mustafizul Haq Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. (C.M.Application No.110573 of 2021) It is informed that one of the applicants has died during pendency of the writ petition. Substitution application filed on behalf of other applicants is allowed. Delay in filing substitution application is condoned. Let the necessary substitution be carried out during course of the day. (Order on memo of petition) Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. Learned counsel for petitioner argues that after the decision of dismissal, an application was filed at the appellate stage on which the impugned order dated 28.11.2013 was passed rejecting the said application. On perusal of the order, it is revealed that by means of amendment application, the petitioner has sought addition of three issues. The appellate court has rightly held that there was no provision for addition of issues as was sought through the amendment application and the said application, in view of the court also deserves to be rejected and was rightly rejected. The writ petition lacks merit and is dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 13.10.2023 Renu/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.