Jitendra Bahadur Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10077 of 2023 Applicant :- Jitendra Bahadur Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Irfan Siddiqui,Afaq Zaki Khan,Brijesh Singh Vishen Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shamim Ahmed,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the order/report dated 27.09.2023 submitted by the circle officer, Mahrajganj, District-Rae Bareli, by means of which in Case Crime No.409/2023 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 504, 506, 427, 452, 325, 307 IPC and Section 3(2)(5) S.C./S.T. Act has been added while earlier FIR was lodged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 504, 506, 427, 452, 308 IPC & Section 3(1)(Da) & Dha of S.C./ S.C. Act. The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that no offence against the applicant are disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a mala-fide intention for the purpose of harassment. Per contra, the learned A.G.A. has contended that from the allegation made in the complaint prima facie offence is made out against the applicant. The innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at the pre trial stage. Therefore, the applicant do not deserve any indulgence. From the perusal of the impugned order, this Court does not find any illegality or irregularity in the impugned order. The entire matter pertains to the factual aspect, which cannot be ascertained under Section 482 Cr.P.C.. At the stage of issuing process the court below is not expected to examine and assess in detail the material placed on record, only this has to be seen whether prima facie cognizable offence is disclosed or not. The Apex Court has also laid down the guidelines where the criminal proceedings could be interfered and quashed in exercise of its power by the High Court in the following cases:-(i) R.P. Kapoor Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1960 S.C. 866, (ii) State of Haryana Vs. Bhajanlal, 1992 SCC (Crl.)426, (iii) State of Bihar Vs. P.P. Sharma, 1992 SCC (Crl.)192 and (iv) Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another, (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cri.) 283. From the aforesaid decisions the Apex Court has settled the legal position for quashing of the proceedings at the initial stage. The test to be applied by the court is to whether uncontroverted allegation as made prima facie establishes the offence and the chances of ultimate conviction is bleak and no useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing criminal proceedings to be continue. In S.W. Palankattkar & others Vs. State of Bihar, 2002 (44) ACC 168, it has been held by the Hon'ble Apex Court that quashing of the criminal proceedings is an exception than a rule. The inherent powers of the High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C itself envisages three circumstances under which the inherent jurisdiction may be exercised:-(i) to give effect an order under the Code, (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of the court ; (iii) to otherwise secure the ends of justice. The power of High Court is very wide but should be exercised very cautiously to do real and substantial justice for which the court alone exists. The High Court would not embark upon an inquiry as it is the function of the Trial Judge/Court. The interference at the threshold of quashing of the criminal proceedings in case in hand cannot be said to be exceptional as it discloses prima facie commission of an offence. In the result, the prayer for quashing of summoning order is refused. However, the applicant is directed to appear and surrender before the court below and apply for bail within three weeks from today, the prayer for bail shall be considered expeditiously by the court below in accordance with law after hearing the Public Prosecutor. With the aforesaid observations, this application is finally disposed of. The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad or certified copy issued from the Registry of the High Court, Allahabad. The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. Order Date :- 13.10.2023 Manoj K. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench