- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 13 October 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 8693/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8693 of 2023 Petitioner :- Deep Chand Respondent :- State Information Commissioner (S-9) Lko. Thru. Its Registrar And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Neeraj Tewari Counsel for Respondent :- Shikhar Anand,C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Shikhar Anand, learned counsel for the State Information Commissioner.
¶2By the present writ petition, petitioner has challenged the order dated 14.12.2020 passed by the State Information Commissioner.
¶3Learned counsel for petitioner submits that at page-2 of the aforesaid order, it is noted that earlier also petitioner was given opportunity to provide information on 17.9.2020 and
14.12.2020 and since he had not complied with the same, penalty was imposed upon him.
¶4The impugned order was passed on 14.12.2020, therefore, it is apparent that two opportunities were not given as noted in the order. In view thereof, the desirability of giving two opportunities could not be fulfilled.
¶5In view of above, the impugned order dated 14.12.2020 cannot stand and is set aside with liberty to the State Information Commissioner to pass a fresh order in accordance with law after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
¶6The writ petition stands allowed. [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 13.10.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.