VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ravi Kant v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Civil Sectt. Lko and Others

Dismissed on merits/Rejected
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
13 October 2023
Bench
Sangeeta Chandra, Karunesh Singh Pawar
Case no.
7966/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7966 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ravi Kant Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Civil Sectt. Lko And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Verma,Gopal Ji Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. who appears on behalf of the State Respondents.

¶2This petition has been filed with the following main prayers:- "i. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of writ of Certiorari to quash the impugned first information report dated

26.6.2023 lodged by the opposite party no.4 which is registered as FIR No. 0394 of 2023 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B 1.P.C., at Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Ayodhya, which is contained in Annexure No.1 to the writ petition. ii. To issue a writ of Mandamus or a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of the impugned first information report dated 26.6.2023 lodged by the opposite party no.4 which is registered as FIR No. 0394 of 2023 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B I.P.C., at Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Ayodhya, which is contained in Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition."

¶3It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is completely innocent and has falsely been implicated in the impugned F.I.R.

¶4As per the prosecution story, one imposter by the name of Mithun Kumar was found to be given examination for the selection of Gram Vikas Adhikari. The Centre Superintendent caught Mithun Kumar and from his possession the admit card of the petitioner was recovered.

¶5This Court having gone through the F.I.R. finds that the petitioner is the beneficiary of the offence of Mithun Kumar posing himself as Ravi Kant while giving examination for the benefit of the petitioner.

¶6This Court finds no good ground to show interference in the impugned F.I.R.

¶7The writ petition stands dismissed. Order Date :- 13.10.2023 Darpan Sharma High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.