VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vishwanath Alias Vineet Gaud and Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
16 October 2023
Bench
Shree Prakash Singhauthor
Case no.
10132/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 28 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10132 of 2023 Applicant :- Vishwanath Alias Vineet Gaud And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Niyaj Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record.

¶2Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed with prayer to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.17302 of 2022 (State Versus Vishwanath alias Vineet Gaud and other) arising out of Case Crime No.7 of 2022, under sections-147, 504, 323, 354, 452, 427 and 506 I.P.C., relating to Police Station-Baskhari, District-Ambedkar Nagar, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar, as well as impugned chargesheet no. 52/2022, dated

4.4.2022, under sections-147, 504, 323, 354, 452, 427 and 506 I.P.C. in aforesaid case crime number, and impugned cognizance/ summoning order dated 20.12.2022, passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar

¶3Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicants were not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report.

¶4At this stage, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51.

¶5Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants.

¶6On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicants appear before the trial court within three weeks from today and file bail application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).

¶7The application is disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 16.10.2023 Manoj K. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.