- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 16 October 2023
- Bench
- Manish Mathur
- Case no.
- 8051/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 20 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8051 of 2023 Petitioner :- Dr. Dinesh Kumar Chauhan Respondent :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Ayush Civil Secrt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suresh Chandra Verma,Praveen Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
¶2Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties for payment of pensionary benefits in accordance with directions issued by this Court in Writ - A No. - 61974 of 2011, Dr. Amrendra Narain Srivastava v. State of U.P. & others.
¶3It has been submitted that petitioner is similarly placed as persons in aforesaid writ petition and therefore is entitled for aforesaid benefits.
¶4For the said grievance, petitioner has already submitted a representation but seeks liberty to file a fresh representation before the authority concerned. At present, learned counsel for petitioner restricts prayer with regard to final decision on the same.
¶5Considering the innocuous prayer, without entering into merits, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party no.1 i.e. Principal Secretary, Department of Ayush U.P., Civil Secretariat, Lucknow who shall consider and decide the same in light of decision in Dr. Amrendra Narain Srivastava v. State of U.P. & others (Writ - A No. - 61974 of 2011) within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority along with fresh representation. Petitioner shall annex a copy of aforesaid judgment along with fresh representation.
¶6With aforesaid observations and directions, the petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 16.10.2023 Satish High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.