- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 16 October 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 8935/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8935 of 2023 Petitioner :- Nitya Nand Joshi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Prin.Secy. Housing And Urban Planning Deptt. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Diwakar Prasad Sharma,Rajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel and the learned Standing Counsel for the State/respondents.
¶2Petitioner has approached this Court claiming that he is entitled for a sale deed from respondent no.2/Secretary Sarojani Nagar Sainik Cooperative Society Ltd. as the earlier owner has transferred his rights in favour of the petitioner.
¶3Petitioner could not show that the respondent no.2, is covered by Article 12 of the Constitution of Indian, therefore, no mandamus can be issued to the respondent no.2.
¶4In view of the aforesaid, the petition is consigned to record with liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate remedy in accordance with law. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 16.10.2023 Arjun/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.