- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 16 October 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 9009/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9009 of 2023 Petitioner :- Santosh Kumari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Commissioner And Secy. Board Of Revenue, Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Naresh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Zafar Aziz Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Shri Zafar Aziz, learned counsel appearing for the Insurance Company. It is the case of the petitioner that the claim for compensation has been rejected by the Insurance Company on 07.05.2019 against which, the petitioner has moved a representation/appeal to the Committee headed by the District Magistrate on 03.04.2023. The said representation/appeal of the petitioner is still pending. This writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Committee headed by the District Magistrate concerned to decide the representation/appeal of the petitioner by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 16.10.2023 Nitesh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.