VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

M/S Archana Press Thru. Proprietor Shri Atul Naraian Srivastava v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic Education Civil Sectt. Lko. and 2 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
16 October 2023
Bench
Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
Case no.
WRIC 8970/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8970 of 2023 Petitioner :- M/S Archana Press Thru. Proprietor Shri Atul Naraian Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic Education Civil Sectt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhinav Srivastava,Rahul Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.

¶2Present writ petition is filed by the petitioner for the following main relief: "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no.2 to sanction the necessary funds and ensure the payment of outstanding dues in the tune of (Rupees Six Lacs forty thousand three hundred eighty seven only) along with interest @ 18% p.a."

¶3Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner in this regard has already moved a representation before respondent no.3. He submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufficiently met in case representation of petitioner for the said purposes is considered and decided by respondent no.2 in a time bound manner.

¶4Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the same.

¶5In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.2-Education Director (Basic), U.P., Nishatganj, Lucknow, raising all its grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents in support of its claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order.

¶6In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from the date, a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him.

¶7It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law.

¶8With the aforesaid directions, present writ petition is disposed of. [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 16.10.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.